North West community leaders held three workshops to consider
the Traditional Courts Bill which is currently out for public comments.
Discussions on the Bill have been robust, with many depicting the brutal
oppressive state of traditional governance they are subjected to in their rural
communities. Communities insist that many Chiefs are not fit and proper to
preside over (traditional) courts, and that the traditional courts bill should
not be enacted whilst the land claims, which will have direct impact on traditional
structures and governance, were still pending.
Other pertinent points raised against the Bill are that:
The North West
public hearings are scheduled for the 18
May 2012, 10am at Tlhabane Hall.
‘Why are rural
communities sent to a township to discuss a Bill that impacts on rural
traditional customs?’, asked concerned community leaders from Tsitsing village.
- The Bill is gender biased and discriminatory against women since the role of women in traditional structures is not fairly treated;
- The Bill denies accused/defendant/respondent parties the right to legal representation;
- The Bill does not afford accused/defendant/respondent a choice to litigate in other judicial structures (eg magistrates courts);
- The Bill empowers the chiefs to impose unlawful sanctions or punishments like ‘lepasha’ (working for the chief or community without pay);
- The Bill does not recognize other traditional dispute resolution structures at dikutle (community) level;
- The Bill will endorse and empower, disputed and apartheid imposed chiefs onto communities;
- The Bill does not provide adequately on the need to assess the fitness and competency of the chiefs to hold public office like the traditional court;
- The Bill does not afford land claiming communities a choice not to be subjected to traditional courts; and
- The Bill does not take into account the disputed traditional authorities, land restitution process and current territorial disputes
No comments:
Post a Comment